Current:Home > reviewsThe Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of ‘Sabotage’ song in ad -Keystone Capital Education
The Beastie Boys sue Chili’s parent company over alleged misuse of ‘Sabotage’ song in ad
View
Date:2025-04-16 09:27:43
NEW YORK (AP) — The Beastie Boys are suing the parent company of Chili’s in a case that accuses the chain restaurant of running an advertisement that used the hip-hop trio’s smash hit “Sabotage” without permission.
The rap group, in a federal case filed Wednesday in New York, alleged Brinker International created a Chili’s ad that used significant portions of “Sabotage” and ripped off the song’s music video.
Brinker International did not immediately return an email seeking comment. The court filings did not list an attorney for Brinker.
Debuting in 1994, “Sabotage” became a huge hit for The Beastie Boys, and its accompanying music video, where the group’s three members donned wigs, fake mustaches and sunglasses in a parody of 1970s crime television shows, is one of the most recognizable in the genre.
The lawsuit accused Brinker of creating a Chili’s social media ad in 2022 that used parts of the song alongside a video of three people wearing 1970’s-style disguises stealing ingredients from a Chili’s restaurant.
The case was filed by surviving Beastie Boys members Adam Horovitz and Michael Diamond, along with the executor of the estate of Adam Yauch, a band member who died of cancer in 2012. Yauch, in his will, specifically barred the use of his music in advertisements.
The Beastie Boys in 2014 won $1.7 million in a copyright violation case against the maker of Monster Energy drink for the company’s unauthorized use of one of the group’s songs.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Natural Gas Samples Taken from Boston-Area Homes Contained Numerous Toxic Compounds, a New Harvard Study Finds
- As some families learn the hard way, dementia can take a toll on financial health
- College Acceptance: Check. Paying For It: A Big Question Mark.
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- In Nevada’s Senate Race, Energy Policy Is a Stark Divide Between Cortez Masto and Laxalt
- Rediscovered Reports From 19th-Century Environmental Volunteers Advance the Research of Today’s Citizen Scientists in New York
- The racial work gap for financial advisors
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- President Biden: Climate champion or fossil fuel friend?
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- California Passed a Landmark Law About Plastic Pollution. Why Are Some Environmentalists Still Concerned?
- Oil Industry Moves to Overturn Historic California Drilling Protection Law
- Q&A: The Activist Investor Who Shook Up the Board at ExxonMobil, on How—or if—it Changed the Company
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Celebrating Victories in Europe and South America, the Rights of Nature Movement Plots Strategy in a Time of ‘Crises’
- In Africa, Conflict and Climate Super-Charge the Forces Behind Famine and Food Insecurity
- Proteger a la icónica salamandra mexicana implíca salvar uno de los humedales más importantes del país
Recommendation
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
The weight bias against women in the workforce is real — and it's only getting worse
Pamper Yourself With the Top 18 Trending Beauty Products on Amazon Right Now
The banking system that loaned billions to SVB and First Republic
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
The weight bias against women in the workforce is real — and it's only getting worse
In An Unusual Step, a Top Medical Journal Weighs in on Climate Change
The best picket signs of the Hollywood writers strike