Current:Home > ContactAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Keystone Capital Education
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-28 02:52:14
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (848)
Related
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- AbbVie's blockbuster drug Humira finally loses its 20-year, $200 billion monopoly
- Larry Birkhead Shares Rare Selfie With His and Anna Nicole Smith’s Daughter Dannielynn
- Inside Clean Energy: The Racial Inequity in Clean Energy and How to Fight It
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Could Migration Help Ease The World's Population Challenges?
- How 'modern-day slavery' in the Congo powers the rechargeable battery economy
- Driver hits, kills pedestrian while fleeing from Secret Service near White House, officials say
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- A New Program Like FDR’s Civilian Conservation Corps Could Help the Nation Fight Climate Change and Transition to Renewable Energy
Ranking
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Warming Trends: Tuna for Vegans, Battery Technology and Climate Drives a Tree-Killer to Higher Climes
- Nearly 1 in 10 U.S. children have been diagnosed with a developmental disability, CDC reports
- Rumer Willis Shares Photo of Bruce Willis Holding First Grandchild
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Inside Clean Energy: Here’s How Covid-19 Is Affecting The Biggest Source of Clean Energy Jobs
- Maryland’s Capital City Joins a Long Line of Litigants Seeking Climate-Related Damages from the Fossil Fuel Industry
- FDA approves first over-the-counter birth control pill, Opill
Recommendation
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
Inside Clean Energy: Here’s How Covid-19 Is Affecting The Biggest Source of Clean Energy Jobs
Warming Trends: Couples Disconnected in Their Climate Concerns Can Learn About Global Warming Over 200 Years or in 18 Holes
Justice Department investigating Georgia jail where inmate was allegedly eaten alive by bedbugs
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Restaurants charging extra for water, bread and workers' health plan
Baby boy dies in Florida after teen mother puts fentanyl in baby bottle, sheriff says
The new global gold rush